Legal Opinion

Stewart-Warner Corporation, Cross-Appellee v. The City of Pontiac, Michigan, and American Sign & Indicator Corporation, Cross-Appellants

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided September 2, 1983No. 81-1611, 81-1631Published

1Opinion of the Court

717 F.2d 269

219 U.S.P.Q. 1162

STEWART-WARNER CORPORATION, Plaintiff-Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v.

The CITY OF PONTIAC, MICHIGAN, and American Sign & Indicator

Corporation, Defendants-Appellees, Cross-Appellants.

Nos. 81-1611, 81-1631.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Feb. 21, 1983.

Decided Sept. 2, 1983.

Alfonse J. D'Amico, Barnes, Kisselle, Raisch & Choate, Detroit, Mich., Melvin M. Goldenberg (argued), McDougall, Hersh & Scott, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant, cross-appellee.

William J. Coughlin, Harness, Dickey & Pierce, Birmingham, Mich., William L. Anthony, Jr. (argued),…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Kropa v. RobieCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1951
  3. Timely Products Corporation, Raphael J. Costanzo v. Stanley ArronCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
  4. In Re Yarn Processing Patent Validity Litigation. Sauquoit Fibers Company v. Leesona Corporation, Kayser-Roth Corporation (In Its Own Name and D/B/A Kayser-Roth Hosiery Companyand Kayser-Roth Hosiery Co., Inc.) v. Leesona Corporation, Leesona Corporation v. The Duplan CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  5. Schnading Corporation v. Gaines Manufacturing Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1974

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API