Legal Opinion
Charles Schwartzman and Mary Schwartzman v. Tenneco Manufacturing Company (Surviving Corporation After Merger of Cary Chemicals, Inc., With and Into Tenneco Manufacturing Company) and Tenneco Corporation. Hyman L. Rutman, Jack Pallatz v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, Tenneco Manufacturing Company, Tenneco Corporation and Cary Chemicals, Inc. Hyman L. Rutman
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 31, 1967No. 16068Published
1Opinion of the Court
375 F.2d 123
Charles SCHWARTZMAN and Mary Schwartzman
v.
TENNECO MANUFACTURING COMPANY (Surviving Corporation After
Merger of Cary Chemicals, Inc., With and Into
Tenneco Manufacturing Company) and
Tenneco Corporation.
Hyman L. Rutman, Appellant.
Jack PALLATZ
v.
TENNESSEE GAS TRANSMISSION COMPANY, Tenneco Manufacturing
Company, Tenneco Corporation and Cary Chemicals, Inc.
Hyman L. Rutman, Appellant.
Nos. 16067, 16068.
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.
Argued Feb. 7, 1967.
Decided March 31, 1967.
Samuel Kalmanash, New York City (Hastings, Taylor & Willard, Dorsey & Dorsey, Wilmington, Del., on the…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schwartzman v. Tenneco Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967