Legal Opinion
Schwartzman v. Tenneco Manufacturing Co.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 31, 1967No. Nos. 16067, 16068PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
This appeal has been taken from a final order approving a compromise and settlement of certain litigation and dismissing the complaints accordingly. The original plaintiffs were minority stockholders of a corporation who believed that the corporation had been treated unfairly in certain intercorporate agreements and a subsequent merger. After considerable litigation the original plaintiffs joined in the proposed settlement. However, the appellant, an intervening minority stockholder, objected to the proposed settlement and now challenges the order confirming it.
The…
3Cited by4 opinions
- Greenfield v. Villager Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
- Research Corporation v. Asgrow Seed Company, Asgrow Seed Company International Asgrow Kilgore Company and United Hagie Hybrids, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1970
- Charles Schwartzman and Mary Schwartzman v. Tenneco Manufacturing Company (Surviving Corporation After Merger of Cary Chemicals, Inc., With and Into Tenneco Manufacturing Company) and Tenneco Corporation. Hyman L. Rutman, Jack Pallatz v. Tennessee Gas Transmission Company, Tenneco Manufacturing Company, Tenneco Corporation and Cary Chemicals, Inc. Hyman L. RutmanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Greenfield v. Villager Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973