American Freedom Insurance v. Smith
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice McNULTY
The parties to the instant appeal contest the interpretation and application of an automobile insurance policy’s “automatic insurance” provision, which offers coverage for newly acquired vehicles for a limited period. The trial court found that the provision provided coverage. We affirm.
The day after his purchase of a second car, and while driving to the office of the insurer of his first car, defendant Corey Smith was involved in an auto accident which resulted in the total loss of the vehicle and injuries to himself and his passenger. Five days later, Smith made a claim under the uninsured…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Foutch v. O'BRYANTIllinois Supreme Court · 1984
- Colonial Penn Insurance v. GuzorekIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
- Farm & City Insurance Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
- Palmer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1981
- United Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance v. ElderIllinois Supreme Court · 1981
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Mid-Century Insurance Co. v. RoblesColorado Court of Appeals · 2011
- Capitol Indemnity Corp. v. Elston Self Service Wholesale Groceries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
- Ponds Ex Rel. Poole v. Hertz Corp.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
- Schuster v. Occidental Fire & Casualty Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- O'Neal-Vidales v. ClarkAppellate Court of Illinois · 2015