Legal Opinion

Central Savings Bank v. City of New York

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 21, 1939PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Per curiam

In our opinion in this case we stated that under the statute property is “ taken without due process of law (State Const, art. 1, § 6) and,” etc. (279 N. Y. 266, 275). A statute repugnant to the due process clause of the State Constitution is repugnant also to the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States. The clauses are formulated in the same words and are intended for the protection of the same fundamental rights of the individual and there is, logically, no room for distinction in definition of the scope of the two clauses.

Decisions of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Morehead v. New York Ex Rel. TipaldoSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Central Savings Bank v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1938

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Oneida Indian Nation v. Madison CountyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
  2. Coakley v. JaffeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1999
  3. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. New York State Labor Relations BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  4. Claim of McCann v. Walsh Construction Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
  5. State of the Netherlands v. Federal Reserve Bank of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API