Legal Opinion

Garrett Enterprises Consolidated, Inc. v. Allen Utilities, LLC

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided October 20, 2015No. 2013-CA-02099-COAPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILSON, J.,

for the Court:

¶ 1. The circuit court granted the motion to compel. arbitration filed by. defendants Kip Allen and Allen Utilities LLC (AU),1 finding that Allen and AU are third-party beneficiaries of two subcontracts, which contain arbitration provisions, between plaintiff Garrett Enterprises Consolidated Inc. (Garrett) and Hensley R. Lee Contracting Inc. (Lee). However, the subcontracts’ arbitration provisions are expressly limited to claims “between the Contractor [i.e., Lee] and the Subcontractor [i.e., Garrett],” nothing in the subcontracts grants Allen or AU any enforceable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Pursue Energy Corp. v. PerkinsMississippi Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Burns v. Washington Savings & Great Southern Savings & Loan Ass'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1965
  3. BC Rogers Poultry, Inc. v. WedgeworthMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
  4. One South, Inc. v. HollowellMississippi Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Epperson v. SouthbankMississippi Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bostick v. DeSoto County Ex Rel. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017
  2. Gordon Kleyle v. Myrna DeograciasCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  3. BLW MOTORS, LLC v. Vicksburg Ford Lincoln Mercury, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2020
  4. Beher Holdings Trust v. FrascognaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2019
  5. Bostick v. DeSoto County Ex Rel. Board of SupervisorsCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API