Legal Opinion

Leal Santos v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 13, 2008No. 07-2110PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOWARD, Circuit Judge.

In a removal proceeding before an Immigration Judge (“IJ”), petitioner Aldevino Manuel Leal Santos (“Santos”) argued as a defense that he met the requirements for derivative citizenship because his mother was physically present in the United States for the requisite time prior to his birth. That argument was rejected by the IJ and by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”). The Third Circuit Court of Appeals transferred the case, for reasons that will become clear later, to the District of Massachusetts for fact-finding on Santos’s derivative citizenship claim. The…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Stanley Russell Scales, Jr. v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  2. Janeiro v. Urological Surgery Professional Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  3. Cesar Batista v. John Ashcroft, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. WeidulCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Raimond N. Tullius v. Madeleine AlbrightCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Shepherd v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  2. Nadal-Ginard v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
  3. Lopez v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
  4. Junior Ricketts v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2018
  5. Miranda v. SessionsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API