Legal Opinion

Junior Ricketts v. Attorney General United States

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 30, 2018No. 16-3182PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JORDAN, Circuit Judge.

When an alien faces removal under the Immigration and Nationality Act, one potential defense is that the alien is not an alien at all but is actually a national of the United States. 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (b)(5). An individual contesting a final order of removal has the opportunity to raise that defense in a petition for review and, if it appears to the appellate court considering the petition that a genuine factual question exists as to the petitioner's nationality, that court must transfer the proceeding to the district court where the petitioner resides, for a nationality…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. RuizSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
  2. Henson v. Santander Consumer USA Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Matal v. TamSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Songbyrd, Inc. v. Estate of Albert B. Grossman, Doing Business as Bearsville Records, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
  5. Mackey v. ShalalaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. DEFENSE DISTRIBUTED v. GREWALDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
  2. Guardian Life Ins Co of Americ v. Tina GonnellaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  3. Jackson v. Attorney General United States of AmericaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020
  4. Junior Ricketts v. Attorney General United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Franco PosliguaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API