Legal Opinion
Farmers Co-Operative Store v. Lloyd
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided June 7, 1935No. 30,303PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Holt, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from the order denying its motion for a new trial.
The complaint alleges that plaintiff, a domestic corporation, has conducted a general store and implement business at Cleveland, Minnesota, since 1924, and that defendant Lloyd was its manager during that time until May 18, 1932, having charge of its business, money, property, and accounts; that defendant Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company gave a bond to indemnify plaintiff against loss through larceny or embezzlement of Lloyd while such manager; and that between January 1, 1931, and May 1, 1932, while said…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Monongahela Coal Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co. of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1899
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Bank of BatesvilleSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Lahr v. KraemerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Liberty State Bank v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
3Cited by3 opinions
- Village of Plummer v. Anchor Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1953
- Raymond Farmers Elevator Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
- Lloyd v. Farmers Co-Operative StoreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936