Legal Opinion

Kinter v. Pickard

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1887PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Isabella. (Hart, J.) Replevin. Plaintiff brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Campbell, O. J.

Plaintiff sued in replevin for goods and chattels taken from his store by defendant under an execution upon a decree against Aaron Wessels. The decree is averred to have been made in a suit by one Miller against Aaron Wessels, jointly with the administrator of Samuel B. Wessels, deceased, and was rendered July 19,1884. The execution was issued and levied in August, 1885, and was for $2,300. It does not appear from the record for what purpose, or under what claim, the bill was filed. It appears by *126an amendment to the bill of exceptions that the cause was at issue in 1876. The…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. French v. NewberryMichigan Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Walton Cranberry Co. v. SeamonMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API