Walton Cranberry Co. v. Seamon
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Wexford; Lamb, J. Bill by the Walton Cranberry Company against Isaac N. Seamon and Lieu P. Haskins for an injunction, damages, and other relief. From a decree for complainant, against defendant Seamon, and dismissing the bill as to defendant Haskins, defendant Seamon appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, C. J.
This suit was commenced for the pur-
pose of obtaining an injunction requiring the defendants to remove an obstruction in the nature of a dam built by them across a stream of water, known as the “Little Creek,” at a point about 40 rods south of a dam across said creek, owned by complainant, and to obtain a restraining order prohibiting the defendants from placing any obstruction in said creek that would interfere with the flow of water released from the dam of the complainant, and for damages. The hearing was had in open court on pleadings and proofs, at the close of which the bill of…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- City Council v. LombardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Athens Manufacturing Co. v. RuckerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1887
- Gregory v. BushMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
- Cornwell Manufacturing Co. v. SwiftMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Hughesville Water Co. v. PersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Felton v. WedthoffMichigan Supreme Court · 1915
- Michigan Central Railroad v. Garfield Petroleum Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1940