Scott v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON APPELLANTS’ MOTION FOR REHEARING
ODOM, Judge.
This is an appeal in a bond forfeiture case. On original submission the appeal was dismissed due to an untimely filing of a cost bond. It now appears we were in error and that the cost bond was timely filed. The motion for rehearing is granted and the appeal is reinstated.
Three contentions are raised on appeal, all of which assert the forfeited bond was not a valid and binding undertaking in law. The first two contentions complain of the failure of the bond to state the date and court at which the principal was required to appear, as…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
- Myers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
3Cited by8 opinions
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
- Domanski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Frontier Insurance Co. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2001
- Marroquin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1997
- Watson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2000
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.