Legal Opinion

Watson v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 18, 2000No. 04-00-00211-CVPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

TOM RICKHOFF, Justice.

This is an appeal from a judgment holding Artis and Lela Watson liable, as sureties, on a bail bond. Because we hold that any error in the execution of the bond was waived, we affirm.

BACKGROUND

The Watsons executed a bail bond as sureties for their son, William Watson. When William did not appear in court, the court entered a judgment nisi entitling the State to forfeiture of the bond. At the hearing on the bond forfeiture case, the Watsons argued they should be exonerated from liability because the bond was not a valid and binding undertaking in law. The court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Alvarez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
  2. Tocher v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Balboa v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981
  4. Lyles v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1979
  5. Scott v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Garza, G. Rudolph, Jr. v. Texas, the State Of, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2001
  2. John Mining D/B/A Fast Action Bail Bonds v. Hays County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006
  3. John Mining D/B/A Fast Action Bail Bonds v. Hays County Bail Bond Board, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API