Legal Opinion

In re Quigley

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided December 19, 1989No. 89-61PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEBEKER, Chief Judge:

Michael Quigley, a veteran receiving benefits from the Department of Veterans Affairs, asserted in a letter to the Court that his fee-basis card — a document entitling him to specific medical benefits — was about to be revoked. Quigley attached to his letter a copy of a letter from the Chief of the Medical Administration Service which advised that the fee-basis card was to be revoked and that Quigley had a right to appeal the revocation decision within the medical center to the Director. Quigley sought from this Court an emergency hearing and an injunction preventing the…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Dean Foods Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Mokal v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Erspamer v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  3. In re the Fee Agreement of SmithUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1993
  4. Aronson v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994
  5. March v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API