Legal Opinion

In re the Disciplinary Action Against Wang

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1987No. C6-87-1337PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SEDGWICK, Judge.

In this contested case proceeding, Dr. Joseph Wang appeals from the Minnesota Board of Dentistry’s (“Board’s”) order (1) suspending his license for making “suggestive or improper advances” to patients and for “improper or unauthorized prescription” of a legend drug, and (2) conditioning a stay of suspension on his paying $35,000 towards the costs of the proceeding. We affirm the suspension, but reverse and remand the imposition of costs.

FACTS

Wang is a licensed dentist and certified oral maxillofacial surgeon, and he has a Ph.D. in medical pharmacology. Wang has been…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Reserve Mining Co. v. HerbstSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. McRostie v. City of OwatonnaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1922
  4. Schulte v. Transportation Unlimited, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Padilla v. Minnesota State Board of Medical ExaminersCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In Re the Disciplinary Action Against the Dentist License of WangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API