Legal Opinion

State v. Curtis

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided October 10, 1972PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARCHIBALD, Justice.

The defendant, indicted for assault and battery of a high and aggravated nature (17 M.R.S.A. § 201), elected to waive trial by jury and, after trial before a single Justice of the Superior Court, was convicted of simple assault. He has appealed and assigns, as a basis therefor, the following reason:

“The court erred in refusing to grant a continuance upon request of Defendant’s counsel and such error was prejudicial and material to the conduct of Defendant’s defense and constitutes reversible error.”

We summarize the sequence of events which must be considered in reaching our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Avery v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Neufield v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1941
  3. John C. Rastrom v. Allan L. Robbins, Warden, Maine State PrisonCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
  4. State v. HumeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1951
  5. State v. RastromSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1970

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State v. HealdSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1978
  2. State v. StinsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
  3. Farrell v. TheriaultSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
  4. State v. IfillSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1975
  5. State v. ReedSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API