Legal Opinion

Christopher Calisto v. Fratco

District Court, N.D. Indiana

Decided March 24, 2026No. 3:25-cv-00694Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION CHRISTOPHER CALISTO, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 3:25-CV-00694-CCB-SJF FRATCO, Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER On August 13, 2025, Christopher Calisto, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint (ECF 1) alleging that Defendant Fratco retaliated against him for filing an official grievance. (ECF 1 at 2–3). Along with the complaint, Calisto filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF 2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1), the Court “may authorize the commencement [of a civil lawsuit] without pre-payment of fees…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. James Hoskins v. John PoelstraCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Kenneth A. McCready v. Ebay, Inc., Bruce Kamminga, and David McDuffeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API