Miklavic v. USAir Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
NYGAARD, Circuit Judge.
Appellants appeal from two orders of a United States Magistrate Judge: one dismissing their action against USAir for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and the other denying them leave to amend their complaint. We will affirm.
I
Appellants are fleet service personnel, otherwise known as baggage handlers, employed by USAir at the Pittsburgh, Philadelphia, Buffalo and Boston airports. These baggage handlers were represented by the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (“IBT”) under a collective bargaining agreement, Article 26A of which entitled them…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Nolde Bros., Inc. v. Local No. 358, Bakery & Confectionery Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Louis Vadino v. A. Valey EngineersCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Robert T. Sisco v. Consolidated Rail Corp. And United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- Reginald Childs v. Pennsylvania Federation Brotherhood of Maintenance Way Employees, and National Railroad Passenger CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- Sherry J. Oshiver v. Levin, Fishbein, Sedran & BermanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Philip J. Podobnik v. United States Postal Service National Rural Letter Carriers Association John E. Potter, Postmaster General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2005
- Schuylkill Energy Resources, Inc. v. Pennsylvania Power & Light CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- Bensel v. Allied Pilots Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2004
- Miklavic v. Usair Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.