Oklahoma City v. Orthwein
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Western District of Oklahoma; John H. Cotteral, Judge. Action at law by Walter E. Orthwein against the City of Oklahoma. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the Court
CARLAND, Circuit Judge.
The city of Oklahoma City in 1908 deemed it necessary to pave Classen boulevard. In 1911, it deemed it necessary to pave Linwood boulevard, from the west line of Western avenue to the center line of Tenth street, and also Exchange av-erme. Proceedings were regularly taken as provided by law for the construction of said paving. The benefits resulting from said paving were assessed upon the lands fronting or abutting thereon. The contractor constructing the paving was paid by the issuance by the city of improvement bonds, to be paid by the money arising from the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Reilly v. . City of AlbanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Oklahoma Ry. Co. v. Severns Paving Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. City of DenverCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Commercial National Bank v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1893
- City of Leavenworth v. MillsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Public Market Co. v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Southern Surety Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Munro v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1943
- Moore v. City of NampaSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Town of Capitol Heights v. SteinerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.