Legal Opinion

Dudley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 13, 1922No. 13466PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Accusation of fraudulent sale by tenant; from city court of Dublin — Judge Sturgis. February 16, 1922.

1Opinion of the Court

Bkoyt.es, O. J.

1. When considered in the light of the facts of the case and of the charge of the court as a whole, the instruction complained of contains no reversible error.

2. The venue of the offense was sufficiently shown, as the jury were authorized to find, from the evidence, that the defendant sold the property in question in the county where he was. tried. See, in this connection, Davis v. State, 7 Ga. App. 332 (66 S. E. 960); Womble v. State, 107 Ga. 666 (3) (33 S. E. 630).

3. There is no merit in the ground of the motion for a new trial which alleges that the verdict was not agreed to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Womble v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
  2. Ponder v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API