Ponder v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Accusation of sale of liquor; from city court of Zebulon — Judge Dupree. August 11, 1911.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
The evidence authorized the conviction, and for that reason any discussion of the usual general grounds of the motion for a new trial is useless. However, a Special assignment of error presents a point of great importance, and the determination of the question presented, in our judgment, requires the grant of a new trial. When the jury returned the verdict of guilty the defendant demanded, as was his right, that the jury be polled, and two of the jurors answered that while they consented to the verdict, they did not do so freely and voluntarily. In our judgment the court should have…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1858
- Parker v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1888
- Dyson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cannon v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- Herrin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Georgia Power Co. v. BishopCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Benefield v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2004
- State of Oregon v. ImlahOregon Supreme Court · 1955
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.