Legal Opinion
Peach v. Ultramar Diamond Shamrock
District Court, E.D. Michigan
Decided October 24, 2002No. 01-10095-BCPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO AFFIRM ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION AND DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO REVERSE ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION
LAWSON, District Judge.
The plaintiff, William Peach, was employed by Total Petroleum, Incorporated (TPI) when the company was acquired by defendant Ultramar Diamond Shamrock (Diamond). Peach continued to work for Diamond as part of a transition team, understanding that his term was finite, but having been promised certain severance benefits if he stayed on and fulfilled certain conditions. Within two months of his departure date, Peach was instructed…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Great-West Life & Annuity Insurance v. KnudsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Robert D. Sprague, Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. General Motors Corporation, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Alan Weiner, D.P.M. v. Klais and Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Terry Smith v. Ameritech Ameritech Publishing, Inc. Sickness and Accident Disability Benefit Plan Long Term Disability PlanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ronald Vendetti v. Compass Environmental, IncorpoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2009
- Meyer v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004