Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. Ohio

Decided July 9, 2004No. 1:03-cr-00061Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SARGUS, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the parties’ cross-Motions for Summary Judgment on the administrative record. (Doc. # 11 and # 13). For the reasons that follow, the Plaintiffs motion is granted, in part, and the Defendants’ motion is denied.

I

Plaintiff, Kimberly Meyer [“Plaintiff’], brings this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act [“ERISA”], 29 U.S.C. § 1132(a)(1)(B), seeking long-term disability benefits under a plan maintained by her former employer, Defendant Shell Oil Company. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Black & Decker Disability Plan v. NordSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Bob G. Wilkins v. Baptist Healthcare System, Inc. Life Insurance Company of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  4. Connie M. Miller v. Metropolitan Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
  5. Rush Prudential HMO, Inc. v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API