Legal Opinion

(PS) Reedy v. State of California

District Court, E.D. California

Decided April 14, 2021No. 2:21-cv-00223Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUSTIN G. REEDY, No. 2:21-cv-00223 TLN CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff proceeds pro se in this action. This matter was referred to the undersigned by 18 Local Rule 302(c)(21). 19 Plaintiff has filed an application in support of his request to proceed in forma pauperis. 20 (ECF No. 2.) Plaintiff’s application makes the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The request 21 will be granted. 22 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the court must…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API