Legal Opinion
United States v. Kurzenknabe
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided December 2, 1955No. Cr. A. 263-55PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WORTENDYKE, District Judge.
Defendants were indicted under the provisions of Section 1010 of the Federal Criminal Code, .18 U.S.C. § 1010, which, provi des. that it is a criminal offense for any person .'to make, a false statement in connection with certain transactions with- the Federal Housing Administration. The indictment, which. was .returned, on September. .7, 1955, charges that on or about March 5, 1,952 the defendants made a false completion certificate in order to obtain a loan insured by the Federal Housing Administration.
Defendant Kurzenknabe has moved pursuant to Rule 12(b) (1) of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Falter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
- Stephan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Stogner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- People v. HollandSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
- United States v. GilboyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1958
- Charles Bassil Clements, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.