Legal Opinion

Crenshaw v. Bussey

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 26, 2004No. 03CA0218PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge GRAHAM.

The trial court concluded as a matter of law that the Colorado dead man’s statute did not exclude testimony by Beryl I. Bussey, who asserted a right to be the personal representative of the estate of Theodore Cren-shaw by virtue of her purported common law marriage to him. Tedd Crenshaw and Jeff Crenshaw (the Crenshaws), sons of the decedent from a previous marriage, appeal the resulting judgment in Bussey’s favor. We agree that the trial court erred in admitting Bussey’s testimony, and therefore we vacate the judgment and remand.

Bussey and the decedent met in 1987, and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Valdez v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Thor v. McDearmidCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1991
  3. Breeden v. StoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  4. Smith v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Brayman v. National State Bank of BoulderSupreme Court of Colorado · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Baker v. Wood, Ris & Hames, Professional Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  2. of Daniel Brookoff, M.D. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Colorado · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API