of Daniel Brookoff, M.D. v. Clark
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
JUSTICE HART delivered the Opinion of the Court.
*836 ¶ 1 Colorado's "Dead Man's Statute" has served since 1870 to prevent a party in a case from offering self-serving uncorroborated testimony about statements made by a person who cannot come into court and confirm or rebut that testimony. The statute has been amended many times over the years, most recently in 2002 and 2013. These recent amendments expanded the scope of the Dead Man's Statute, removing language that limited its application to only certain types of cases. Today, self-serving testimony from a party about what a now-deceased person…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Vigil v. FranklinSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. McMichaelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Wise Ex Rel. Wise v. HillmanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Vallagio at Inverness Residential Condominium Ass'n v. Metropolitan Homes, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2017
- Breeden v. StoneSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In the Interest of Ray v. PeopleColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- People v. SalgadoColorado Court of Appeals · 2019
- William Glenn JohnsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas · 2023
- v. Estate of Joel HansenColorado Court of Appeals · 2020