Legal Opinion
Clark v. Schuylerville Central School District
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 11, 2008PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mercure, J.P.
The underlying facts of this action are more fully set forth in our prior decision reinstating plaintiffs cause of action for defamation (24 AD3d 1162 [2005]). Briefly stated, plaintiff, a teacher at defendant Schuylerville Central School District, was placed on administrative leave after showing an “R” rated film to students. At that time, defendant Thomas S. Martin, principal of Schuylerville Junior/Senior High School, stated to Jeffrey Honeywell, an attorney retained by the District to provide legal advice and counsel, that plaintiff had shown the film in violation of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Priest v. HennessyNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Jakobleff v. Cerrato, Sweeney & CohnAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Bertalo's Restaurant Inc. v. Exchange InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- American Reliance Insurance v. National General InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parnes v. ParnesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Clark v. Schuylerville Central School DistrictAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Tenore v. KantrowitzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Greater New York Mutual Insurance v. Alexander Holdings, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011