Legal Opinion

United States v. Felt

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided August 28, 1980No. Crim. 78-00179PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRYANT, Chief Judge.

A

The government has moved in limine to prevent witnesses and defense counsel from unilaterally disclosing in open court certain classified information. 1 Instead, the government has requested an order directing witnesses and defense counsel to review information presented in one of three lists compiled by the government: witnesses are “not to disclose any item on such list during testimony .. . absent specific direction from the court to do so . . .”; counsel are “not knowingly to disclose through questions or argument or [elicitation of] testimony . .…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Herring v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. In Re Adele HalkinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  5. Fred B. Black, Jr. v. Sheraton Corporation of America Appeal of United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Lawyers Guild v. Attorney GeneralDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API