Legal Opinion

National Lawyers Guild v. Attorney General

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 20, 1982No. 77 Civ. 0999 (CLB)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SINCLAIR, Magistrate:

In Discovery Order No. 41 (“D.O. 41”) this court reviewed a proposal by John A. Mintz, Assistant Director-Legal Counsel of the FBI, that the FBI be permitted to use a sampling technique in making its executive *393privilege claims (“2F” deletions; state secrets) rather than claiming separately for every asserted privileged item. See D.O. 41 at 52.1 Pursuant to the court’s directions in D.O. 41, defendants have submitted proposed categories of state secrets with examples of their application. Plaintiff has responded thereto. For the reasons stated below, the sampling technique…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Roviaro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
  4. United States v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  5. Carl Zeiss Stiftung v. V. E. B. Carl Zeiss, JenaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. v. Department of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  2. In Re Grand Jury Subpoena Dated August 9, 2000District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  3. Martin v. Albany Business Journal, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1992
  4. Hudson River Sloop Clearwater, Inc. v. Department Of The NavyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  5. Zuckerbraun v. General Dynamics Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1990

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API