Legal Opinion

Reasoner v. Aetna Life Insurance

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 13, 1984No. Civ. 84-1130-JLI(M)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER

IRVING, District Judge.

Defendant AETNA’S motion to dismiss all DOE defendants and plaintiffs’ motion for remand came on for hearing on June 11, 1984. David D. Martin appeared on behalf of the plaintiffs; Mary Lynne Perry appeared on behalf of defendant AETNA. Having considered the pleadings, the papers submitted in support of and in opposition to the motions, and the oral argument of counsel, the court hereby denies AETNA’S motion to dismiss and grants plaintiffs' motion for remand.

FACTS

Plaintiffs filed suit against AETNA and DOES 1 through 100 in California…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Commissioner v. Estate of BoschSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Colonial Life & Accident Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Goldberg v. CPC International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
  5. Littlefield v. Continental Casualty Co.District Court, C.D. California · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
  2. Zephyr Park, Ltd. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  3. Davis v. Continental InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API