Legal Opinion

Sovereign News Company v. John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting Attorney

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 22, 1980No. 78-3064 to 78-3066PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

These consolidated appeals are from the decision of the district court reported at 448 F.Supp. 306, rendered October 31, 1977, holding parts of the Ohio obscenity statute, R.C. Ohio §§ 2907.01(F) and 2907.32, to be unconstitutionally overbroad and vague under Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).

On December 7, 1978, the Supreme Court of Ohio rendered an opinion in State of Ohio v. Burgun, 56 Ohio St.2d 354, 384 N.E.2d 255 (1978), holding that the Ohio statute when construed to incorporate the guidelines of Miller v. California, is valid and constitutional.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. BurgunOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sovereign News Co. v. FalkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Balderaz v. PorterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
  2. Yniguez v. MoffordDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1990
  3. Sovereign News Co. v. Lee C. Falke, Roy WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  4. United States v. TolczekiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  5. State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API