Sovereign News Company v. John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting Attorney
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Per curiam
These consolidated appeals are from the decision of the district court reported at 448 F.Supp. 306, rendered October 31, 1977, holding parts of the Ohio obscenity statute, R.C. Ohio §§ 2907.01(F) and 2907.32, to be unconstitutionally overbroad and vague under Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).
On December 7, 1978, the Supreme Court of Ohio rendered an opinion in State of Ohio v. Burgun, 56 Ohio St.2d 354, 384 N.E.2d 255 (1978), holding that the Ohio statute when construed to incorporate the guidelines of Miller v. California, is valid and constitutional.…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State v. BurgunOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- Sovereign News Co. v. FalkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
3Cited by8 opinions
- Balderaz v. PorterDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1983
- Yniguez v. MoffordDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1990
- Sovereign News Co. v. Lee C. Falke, Roy WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. TolczekiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
- State v. WolfeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.