Legal Opinion

Sovereign News Co. v. Lee C. Falke, Roy Warner

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 23, 1982No. 80-3694PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

On receipt and consideration of a second appeal in the above-styled case in which *485this court, on December 7, 1979, entered a per curiam opinion, pointing out:

These consolidated appeals are from the decision of the district court reported at 448 F.Supp. 306, rendered October 31, 1977, holding parts of the Ohio obscenity statute, R.C.Ohio §§ 2907.01(F) and 2907.32, to be unconstitutionally over-broad and vague under Miller v. California, 413 U.S. 15, 93 S.Ct. 2607, 37 L.Ed.2d 419 (1973).

On December 7, 1978, the Supreme Court of Ohio rendered an opinion in State of Ohio v. Burgun, 56 Ohio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. State v. BurgunOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Sovereign News Co. v. FalkeDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1977
  4. Sovereign News Company v. John T. Corrigan, Prosecuting AttorneyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Zalman v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  2. Zalman v. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1986
  3. United States v. TolczekiDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1985
  4. Edward A. Janicki and Edward W. Zoltaszek, Cross-Appellees v. Frank Pizza, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1983
  5. G.B. v. RogersDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2010

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API