Legal Opinion

In re Dinglehoef

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1901PublishedCited by 1 opinion

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

PURNELL, District Judge.

The Arm of Dinglehoef Bros, was duly adjudged bankrupt, and a personal property exemption allowed by the constitution and laws of North Carolina allotted to O. F. Dinglehoef, the resident member of the firm. Mayme H. Dinglehoef, named in the petition as a member of the firm of Dinglehoef Bros., now claims a $500 personal property exemption under the same law, as a member of the firm. To the allotment of the exemption the creditors object, on the ground that Mrs. Mayme H. Dinglehoef is not a resident of North Carolina. The referee, Samuel H. MacRae, finds the following…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chitty v. ChittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  2. Chitty v. . ChittySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Finley v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  4. In re StevensonDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 1899
  5. Inhabitants of Jefferson v. Inhabitants of WashingtonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1841

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. First Union National Bank v. RolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API