Legal Opinion · Dissent

Chitty v. . Chitty

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1896PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1DissentClark, J.

There was judgment for the defendant, and plaintiff appealed.

The facts appear in the opinion of the Court. The facts found by the referee and sustained by the Court are as follows:

1. That plaintiff, in November, 1887, owned and occupied as his home place the land now in controversy, and left the State in that month to avoid a warrant out against him for false pretense, (648) with the intention of returning as soon as the case against him should be thrown out of court, and that his wife and children remained on the place until plaintiff returned, about Christmas, 1889; that the plaintiff spent…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Hannon v. GrizzardSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  2. Fulton v. RobertsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
  3. Finley v. . SaundersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Jamestown Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Barker v. Iowa Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  3. In Re Estate of Van MeterDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
  4. In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1982
  5. Croker v. CrokerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API