Boyd v. Insurance Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM SI-IBLBY. Appeal in error from Circuit Court of Shelby County. L. H. Estes, J.
1Opinion of the CourtLurton, J.
This is an action at law upon a policy of fire insurance. The property insured is-described on the face of the policy as a “one-story frame, shingle-roof dwelling-house,' occupied' by good tenants as such.” This policy was issued March 9, 1888, and was for two years.
On January 31, 1889, the property was consumed, by fire. The insurance company, among other. *214pleas, plead that the premises were not occupied, either at time of issuance of policy or at time of loss. There was a judgment for the insurer. Errors are assigned upon the charge of the Court to the jury. Among other things, the Court…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Insurance Co. v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Titus v. . Glens Falls Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Alexander v. . Germania Fire Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1876
- Wall v. . the East River Mutual Insurance Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1852
3Cited by14 opinions
- Fraser v. Ætna Life Insurance Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
- Taylor v. Grand LodgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
- Fidelity Phenix Fire Ins. Co. of New York v. RaperSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941
- Blackman v. United States Casualty Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
- Home Fire Insurance v. KuhlmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1899
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.