Legal Opinion
DEPT. OF AGR. AND CONS. SERV. v. Schick
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided April 29, 1991No. 90-1921PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
580 So.2d 648 (1991)
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Appellant,
v.
Marjorie SCHICK, Robert Schick, Buck Hull and Dot Hull Shaw, Appellees.
No. 90-1921.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
April 29, 1991.
Clinton H. Coulter, Jr., Tallahassee, for appellant.
Randall E. Denker, of Lehrman & Denker, Tallahassee, for appellees.
ERVIN, Judge.
Appellant, the Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services (Department), seeks review of the lower court's order directing it to pay attorney's fees to appellees, Robert and Marjorie Schick, Buck Hull, and Dot Hull Shaw, in an…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
- Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
- Kittel v. KittelSupreme Court of Florida · 1968
- Brunner Enterprises v. Dept. of RevenueSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schick v. Dept. of Agric. & Cons. ServicesSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- Stewart Select Cars, Inc. v. MooreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993