Legal Opinion

Schick v. Dept. of Agric. & Cons. Services

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 26, 1992No. 77906PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

599 So.2d 641 (1992)

Marjorie and Robert SCHICK, et al., Petitioners,

v.

DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE AND CONSUMER SERVICES, Respondent.

No. 77906.

Supreme Court of Florida.

March 26, 1992.

Rehearing Denied June 30, 1992.

Randall E. Denker of Lehrman and Denker, Tallahassee, for petitioners.

Clinton H. Coulter, Jr., Tallahassee, for respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Schick, 580 So.2d 648 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991), (Schick IV), in which the district court certified the following question of great public importance:

IN DETERMINING THE REASONABLENESS OF AN ATTORNEY'S…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurrence.

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Florida Patient's Compensation Fund v. RoweSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Standard Guar. Ins. Co. v. QuanstromSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Strazzulla v. HendrickSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  4. In Re Estate of PlattSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  5. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. PalmaSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sarkis v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
  2. State, Dept. of Transp. v. SkidmoreDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998
  3. Lundy v. FOUR SEASONS OCEAN GRAND PALM BCH.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  4. DOT v. Robbins and Robbins, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  5. Seminole County v. Delco Oil, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API