Legal Opinion
ETHERIDGE v. NOVO NORDISK INC.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided May 26, 2022No. 3:19-cv-13676Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY BRADLEY R. ETHERIDGE, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 19-13676 (MAS) (DEA) v. MEMORANDUM OPINION NOVO NORDISK INC., Defendant. SHIPP, District Judge This matter comes before the Court on Defendant Novo Nordisk Inc.’s (“Novo”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 26.) Plaintiff Bradley R. Etheridge (“Etheridge”) opposed, and Novo replied. (ECF Nos. 24, 25.)' The Court has carefully considered the parties’ submissions and decides the matter without oral argument under Local Civil Rule 78.1. For the reasons below, the Court…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.