Legal Opinion
Caleb Mendoza, et al. v. Tesla, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 25, 2026No. 3:24-cv-08738Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CALEB MENDOZA, et al., Case No. 24-cv-08738-VC (LJC) 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER RESOLVING DISCOVERY 9 v. BRIEF REGARDING 30(B)(6) DEPOSITION TOPICS 10 TESLA, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 54 Defendant. 11 12 13 Before the Court is the parties’ joint letter regarding eight disputed deposition topics from 14 Plaintiffs’ 30(b)(6) deposition notice to Tesla. ECF No. 54. Having considered the parties’ 15 arguments, the record in this case, and the relevant legal authorities, the Court denies Tesla’s 16 request for a protective order…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Soto v. City of ConcordDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
- Rivera v. Nibco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Marc Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Company Vicki WeedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Ault v. International Harvester Co.California Supreme Court · 1974
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.