Scoric v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
In Error to the District Court of the United States for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Philippi; Alston G. Dayton, Judge, Proceedings for criminal contempt in the name of the United States 'against Paul Scoric. From a judgment of conviction, defendant brings^ error.
1Opinion of the Court
WOODS, Circuit Judge.
Most of the assigned errors of procedure, and in the judgment and sentence against the defendant for contempt by reason of his disobedience of an order of injunction of the District Court, have been discussed and disposed of by the opinion in the like case of Meyer Schwartz v. United States, 217 Fed. 866, 133 C. C. A. 576, filed herewith, involving the charge of contempt in disobedience of the same orders. On some points, however, the facts are not precisely the same.
[1] 1. We think the charges against the defendant were sufficiently definite. The petition of November 11,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Armour Packing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Bessette v. W. B. Conkey Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Connors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Holmgren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. DixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Oates v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1915
- Armstrong v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921