Smith v. Landmark Communications, Inc.
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan
The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that, as a matter of law, Landmark Communications, Inc. (Landmark) cannot be held liable under the doctrine of respondeatsuperior for injuries allegedly caused by John S. Niemeyer, a paper carrier, as he was traveling from his home to pick up his day’s supply of newspapers.
Niemeyer’s duties included picking up newspapers for delivery each day at a location designated by Landmark. After obtaining the newspapers, he delivered them to subscribers on an assigned route. Landmark did not pay Niemeyer for the time he spent…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Davis v. MerrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Tri-State Coach Corp. v. WalshSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
- Nixon v. RowlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
- Sayles v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
- Manuel v. CassadaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950
3Cited by20 opinions
- Linnin v. MichielsensDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
- Parker v. Carilion ClinicSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
- Derek A. Ross v. Vincent R. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
- Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
- FELDHEIM v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.