Legal Opinion

Smith v. Landmark Communications, Inc.

Supreme Court of Virginia

Decided June 11, 1993No. Record 921324PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Keenan

The sole issue in this appeal is whether the trial court erred in ruling that, as a matter of law, Landmark Communications, Inc. (Landmark) cannot be held liable under the doctrine of respondeatsuperior for injuries allegedly caused by John S. Niemeyer, a paper carrier, as he was traveling from his home to pick up his day’s supply of newspapers.

Niemeyer’s duties included picking up newspapers for delivery each day at a location designated by Landmark. After obtaining the newspapers, he delivered them to subscribers on an assigned route. Landmark did not pay Niemeyer for the time he spent…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davis v. MerrillSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
  2. Tri-State Coach Corp. v. WalshSupreme Court of Virginia · 1948
  3. Nixon v. RowlandSupreme Court of Virginia · 1951
  4. Sayles v. Piccadilly Cafeterias, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1991
  5. Manuel v. CassadaSupreme Court of Virginia · 1950

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Linnin v. MichielsensDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2005
  2. Parker v. Carilion ClinicSupreme Court of Virginia · 2018
  3. Derek A. Ross v. Vincent R. BryanCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  4. Gutierrez de Martinez v. Drug Enforcement AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1997
  5. FELDHEIM v. TurnerDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API