Legal Opinion

Mathus v. Heckler

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 27, 1987No. 84 C 1336PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

WILLIAM T. HART, District Judge.

Plaintiff has moved for attorney’s fees pursuant to both the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (“EAJA”) and § 206(b) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) (the “Act”). For the reasons stated below, plaintiff’s motion for fees under the EAJA is denied and his motion for fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) is granted.

Facts

Plaintiff Willie Mathus was awarded a period of disability beginning on January 17, 1976. Plaintiff’s benefits were terminated in 1982 when it was determined as a result of a periodic review that his…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Allen S. Berman v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  2. Bohn v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1985
  3. Marvin E. SOPER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Margaret HECKLER, Secretary of Health & Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Haney v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1984
  5. Ruzicka v. HecklerDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Caleb J. TRUAX, Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
  2. Anton L. Hendricks v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
  3. Vitale v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1987
  4. Hodges-Williams v. BarnhartDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2005
  5. Robinson v. BowenDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1988

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API