Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. McClelland

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1943No. File No. Cr. 186Published

1DissentChristianson, J.

In this case'there are two appeals: one from the judgment of conviction and the other from an order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. The two appeals were consolidated and briefed and submitted together. The motion for a new trial was based, among others, on the grounds: (1) that the verdict is against the evidence, and (2) that new evidence has been discovered material to the defendant’s defense which he could not with reasonable diligence have discovered and produced at the trial. In support of the latter ground, numerous and rather voluminous affidavits' were submitted. In the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ballew v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. People v. CarusoNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
  3. Wilder v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1929
  4. State v. PrattSupreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  5. State v. FlathNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API