Legal Opinion

State v. Hunt

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Decided January 25, 1984PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DWYER, Judge.

A jury convicted, appellant of possessing cocaine, a Schedule II controlled substance, with intent to sell and possessing marijuana, a Schedule VI controlled substance. The punishment was set at imprisonment for not less than six nor more than ten years on the cocaine conviction and thirty days confinement on the marijuana conviction. The sentences were ordered to be served concurrently.

Appellant has challenged the sufficiency of the evidence to support the conviction for possession of cocaine with intent to sell. With this in mind, we will narrate the evidence.

In February…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. State v. HeltonTennessee Supreme Court · 1974
  5. State v. McCormickCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1979

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. JacuminTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Meadows v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  3. State v. MeadowsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. State v. McAloonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1986
  5. State of Tennessee v. James PennockCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API