Legal Opinion
State v. Meadows
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee
Decided November 19, 1987No. 86-285-IIIPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WILLIAM S. RUSSELL, Special Judge.
Robert Howard Meadows appeals from his convictions on four counts of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to manufacture, deliver, or sell the substance. The first was a conviction of possessing a substance containing cocaine, a Schedule II substance, in excess of 30 grams, for which he was sentenced to pay a fine of $200,000 and serve a term of forty years in the custody of the Department of Correction. The second conviction involved the possession of the substances of methaqualone, pethidine, amphetamine, secobarbital, and oxycodone,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. JacuminTennessee Supreme Court · 1989
- Meadows v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
- Raines v. Shoney's, Inc.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1995
- State v. HenningTennessee Supreme Court · 1998