Legal Opinion

United States v. Fuller

District Court, N.D. New York

Decided September 7, 1943PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BRYANT, District Judge.

The defendants are charged by indictment with having conspired to violate Section 276b, 40 U.S.C.A. They demur and move to quash on the grounds that the indictment, on its face, is insufficient in law and does not state a cause of action.

Defendant Bird was the master mechanic of the contractor for the construction of the Syracuse Air Base, a public work of the United States. He was fully authorized to hire and discharge workers. Defendants Fuller, Johns and Stephens were officers and business agents of Local Union 545, International Union of Operating Engineers.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Johnson v. Morley Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1938
  2. United States v. LaudaniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1943
  3. United States v. McGrawDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1942

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. CarboneDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API