United States v. McGraw
District Court, N.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
The defendants demur to the indictment in the above-named case and move to quash *928on the grounds that the indictment, on its face, is insufficient in law and does not state facts sufficient to constitute a crime.
In June, 1942, a grand jury returned an indictment against the defendants charging them, in Count 1, with conspiracy to violate Section 276b of Title 40 U.S.C.A., and, in Counts 2, 3, 4 and 5, with violation of said Section.1
The respective counts are couched in identical language and the alleged offense in each count is charged in almost the identical words of…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- United States v. CharlickDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
- United States v. GolderDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. FullerDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1943