Legal Opinion

City of Sioux Falls v. Famestad

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1946No. File No. 8799PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAYES, Circuit Judge.

The appellant, Edith Famestad, was convicted and sentenced in the Municipal Court of the City of Sioux Falls, South Dakota, after a jury trial upon a complaint charging her with the violation of a city ordinance prohibiting sales of intoxicating liquor without having a state license authorizing such sales. She has appealed from an order of the trial court denying a motion in her behalf for a new trial.

The rulings of the trial court assigned as errors will be reviewed in the order in which the same are -treated in the briefs of counsel.

The first point urged by appellant is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Webster v. KnewelSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1924
  2. State v. PluckerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1946
  3. State v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  2. City of Redfield v. WhartonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1962
  3. City of Brookings v. ThomsenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1970
  4. State v. FurlowSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Lee v. DelanoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API