Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Ryan

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 17, 1950No. 35,011PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Action for personal injuries. Plaintiff appeals from the order denying her motion for a new trial after a directed verdict for defendant.

Numerous questions have been raised on the appeal, but only two, which if answered in favor of defendant would be decisive, need be discussed, viz.:(1) Whether the clause ending with the words “personal injury sustained” in a provision in a written lease exempting the lessor from liability to the tenant for personal injury that the lessee covenants and agrees “.To make no claim, and lessee hereby expressly waives any and all claims against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Thornton Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  2. Pettit Grain & Potato Co. v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1948
  3. Weirick v. Hamm Realty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
  4. Lamberton v. RaymondSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
  5. J. D. Moran Manufacturing Co. v. ClarkeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1894

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'CALLAGHAN v. Waller & Beckwith Realty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Leonard v. Mylex Corp. (In Re Northgate Computer Systems, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1999
  3. Eastern Avenue Corp. v. HughesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Kost v. PetersonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
  5. Daltex Inc. v. WESTERN OIL & FUEL COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API